Kim Andrew vs. Paul Wanninger — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Paul Wanninger. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .560) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .266). Paul Wanninger had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Paul Wanninger
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
163
163.55
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
598
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.58
0.58
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
42.54
42.69
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
154
154.52
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
47.93
48.09
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
13.91
13.91
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Paul Wanninger
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 9 Innings
158
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 9 Innings
807
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 9 Innings
759
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Paul Wanninger
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.05