Kim Andrew vs. Dan Walters — Career Comparison

Baby BoomersCaliforniaThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaBoston Red SoxAmerican LeagueSecond Baseman
Gen XMaineThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaSan Diego PadresNational LeagueCatcher

On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Dan Walters. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .634) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .286). Dan Walters had the advantage in home run production (5 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.

Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Dan Walters

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
84
170.27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
296
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
273
553.38
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
0.65
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
64
129.73
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
44
89.19
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
14
28.38
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
2.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
5
10.14
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
20
40.54
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.313
0.313
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.018
0.018
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.078
0.078
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
0.47
140.43
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
27.55
55.84
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
95
192.57
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
83
168.24
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.348
0.348
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.629
0.629
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.114
0.114
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.35
0.35
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.537
0.537
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
20
40.54
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
32
64.86
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
47
95.27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
0.54
160.83
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
27.79
56.34
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
4.05
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
17
34.46
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
4.05
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0
0
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
41
83.11
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
7.22
7.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.41
0.41
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
2.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
3
6.08
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0
0
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
5
10.14
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
2.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
2.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
100
100

Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Dan Walters

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
2
2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
2
4.5
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
81
1.09
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
75
1.01
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
2001
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
667
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
467
6.3
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
1
2.25
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
46
0.62
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
0
0
Dan Walters
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
0.11
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
521
7.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
513
6.92
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
100
100
Dan Walters
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.46
98.46
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
6.333
6.333
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
92.59
92.59
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
6
0.08
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
0
0
Dan Walters
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
0.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Dan Walters
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
0
0
Dan Walters
Career
Per 9 Innings
74
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Dan Walters
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
31
0.42