Kim Andrew vs. Tim Wallach — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Tim Wallach. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .739) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .323). Tim Wallach had the advantage in home run production (260 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Tim Wallach
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
8908
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
0.743
0.743
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
1064.89
71.73
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
0.416
0.416
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
1065.65
71.78
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
6.82
6.82
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 600 PA
192
12.93
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Tim Wallach
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 9 Innings
2192
1.05
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 9 Innings
56470
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 9 Innings
18823.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 9 Innings
6855
3.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 9 Innings
6608
3.16
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.4
96.4
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Tim Wallach
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.015
3.015