Kim Andrew vs. Irv Waldron — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Irv Waldron. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .734) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .356). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Irv Waldron
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.311
0.311
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.769
0.769
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
86.04
79.3
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.356
0.356
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.378
0.378
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
97.91
90.24
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 600 PA
32.55
32.55
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Irv Waldron
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 9 Innings
140
1.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 9 Innings
274
2.11
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 9 Innings
253
1.95
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.34
92.34
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Irv Waldron
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.807
1.807