Kim Andrew vs. Matt Walbeck — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Matt Walbeck. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .597) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .281). Matt Walbeck had the advantage in home run production (28 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Matt Walbeck
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
2280
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.615
0.615
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
181.5
47.76
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.315
0.315
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.205
0.205
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
189.03
49.74
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
6.65
6.65
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 600 PA
56
14.74
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Matt Walbeck
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
653
1.16
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
15242
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
5080.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
3586
6.35
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
3552
6.29
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.05
99.05
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.44
5.44
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Matt Walbeck
Career
Per 9 Innings
188
0.33