Kim Andrew vs. Mike Tresh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Mike Tresh. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .619) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .335). Mike Tresh had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Mike Tresh
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.249
0.249
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.649
0.649
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
300.11
49.51
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.336
0.336
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
361.99
59.72
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
13.83
13.83
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 600 PA
79
13.03
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Mike Tresh
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1019
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 9 Innings
4536
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Mike Tresh
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.31