Kim Andrew vs. Ed Taubensee — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Taubensee. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .767) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .337). Ed Taubensee had the advantage in home run production (94 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Taubensee
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
3178
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.773
0.773
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
412.11
77.81
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
1048
197.86
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.331
0.331
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
422.92
79.85
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 600 PA
50
9.44
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Taubensee
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
892
1.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
20032
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
6677.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
5411
7.29
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
5346
7.21
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.8
98.8
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.993
5.993
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Taubensee
Career
Per 9 Innings
186
0.25