Kim Andrew vs. Lonnie Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Lonnie Smith. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .793) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .373). Lonnie Smith had the advantage in home run production (98 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Lonnie Smith
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
5952
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.832
0.832
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
877.91
88.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
2203
222.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.371
0.371
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
892.62
89.98
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
7.01
7.01
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
69
6.96
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Lonnie Smith
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1356
1.16
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
31616
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
10538.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
2581
2.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
2489
2.13
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.44
96.44
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Lonnie Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.836
1.836