Kim Andrew vs. Ed Sherling — Career Comparison

Baby BoomersCaliforniaThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaBoston Red SoxAmerican LeagueSecond Baseman
Lost GenerationAlabamaThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaPhiladelphia AthleticsAmerican LeagueUnknown

On the career numbers, Ed Sherling posted the stronger offensive profile against Kim Andrew. Ed Sherling posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.500 vs 1.000) and slugging (1.000 vs .500). By the career numbers, Ed Sherling had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.

Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Sherling

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
4
1200
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1.5
1.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.71
212.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1.5
1.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.475
0.475
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Ed Sherling
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.68
203.37
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA