Kim Andrew vs. Paul Radford — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Paul Radford. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .660) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .351). Paul Radford had the advantage in home run production (13 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Paul Radford
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
1361
140.26
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
5822
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.732
0.732
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
706.94
72.85
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
2043
210.55
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
745.58
76.84
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Paul Radford
Career
Per 600 PA
12.97
12.97
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Paul Radford
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
1384
1.05
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
35469
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
11823
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
4485
3.41
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
3963
3.02
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.36
88.36
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Paul Radford
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.863
2.863