Kim Andrew vs. Alex Radcliff — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Alex Radcliff. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .765) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .341). Alex Radcliff had the advantage in home run production (20 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Alex Radcliff
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
431
139.78
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
1850
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.296
0.296
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.783
0.783
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
252.16
81.78
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
620
201.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
276.2
89.58
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 600 PA
123.33
123.33
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Alex Radcliff
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 9 Innings
435
1.07
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 9 Innings
10929
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3643
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 9 Innings
1417
3.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 9 Innings
1294
3.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.32
91.32
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Alex Radcliff
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.975
2.975