Kim Andrew vs. Steve O'Neill — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Steve O'Neill. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .685) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .349). Steve O'Neill had the advantage in home run production (13 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Steve O'Neill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
1590
171.58
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
5560
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
617.19
66.6
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
1894
204.39
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.349
0.349
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.337
0.337
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
681.23
73.51
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
13.43
13.43
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Steve O'Neill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
1533
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
7883
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
7666
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Steve O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.25