Kim Andrew vs. Jim O'Neill — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim O'Neill. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .715) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .321). Jim O'Neill had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim O'Neill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.738
0.738
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
41.41
70.19
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.321
0.321
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.395
0.395
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
46.04
78.04
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
10.73
10.73
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim O'Neill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
439
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.21