Kim Andrew vs. Jack O'Neill — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Jack O'Neill. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .493) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .258). Jack O'Neill had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Jack O'Neill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
1045
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.196
0.196
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
65.11
37.38
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.258
0.258
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
68.98
39.61
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
6.74
6.74
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Jack O'Neill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
283
1.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
7452
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
1868
6.77
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
1819
6.59
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.38
97.38
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.428
6.428
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jack O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
305
1.11