Kim Andrew vs. Buck O'Neil — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Buck O'Neil. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .672) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .319). Buck O'Neil had the advantage in home run production (12 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Buck O'Neil
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
1584
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.715
0.715
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
180.99
68.56
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.319
0.319
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.354
0.354
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
197.72
74.89
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
1
0.38
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Buck O'Neil
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
391
1.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
3246.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
3769
10.45
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
3717
10.3
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.62
98.62
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Buck O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.506
9.506