Kim Andrew vs. Luther O'Neal — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Luther O'Neal. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .495) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .261). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Luther O'Neal
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
70
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
4.7
40.31
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.176
0.176
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
5.07
43.43
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Luther O'Neal
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
1.38
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
450
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
126
7.56
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
124
7.44
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.41
98.41
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.391
5.391