Kim Andrew vs. Rube Oldring — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Rube Oldring. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .671) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .307). Rube Oldring had the advantage in home run production (27 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Rube Oldring
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
1239
145.88
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
5096
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
553.96
65.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
1519
178.85
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.307
0.307
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
614.54
72.36
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 600 PA
12.52
12.52
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Rube Oldring
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 9 Innings
1211
2.39
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 9 Innings
13677
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 9 Innings
2590
5.11
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 9 Innings
2485
4.91
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.95
95.95
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Rube Oldring
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.052
2.052