Kim Andrew vs. Paul O'Dea — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Paul O'Dea. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .662) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .345). Paul O'Dea had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Paul O'Dea
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.693
0.693
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
39.11
52.38
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.345
0.345
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
46.47
62.24
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
21
28.12
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Paul O'Dea
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 9 Innings
101
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.33