Kim Andrew vs. Pat O'Connell — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Pat O'Connell. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .459) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .236). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Pat O'Connell
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
178
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.181
0.181
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.524
0.524
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
11.02
37.16
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.162
0.162
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
11.07
37.3
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Pat O'Connell
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
43
1.04
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1116
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
2.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
1.67
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
80.23
80.23
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pat O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.605
1.605