Kim Andrew vs. Pat Newnam — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Pat Newnam. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .565) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .287). Pat Newnam had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Pat Newnam
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.624
0.624
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
42.94
51.52
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.287
0.287
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
46.09
55.31
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Pat Newnam
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
123
1.23
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
1346
13.47
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
1311
13.12
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.4
97.4
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.659
10.659