Kim Andrew vs. Pat Newnam — Career Comparison

Baby BoomersCaliforniaThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaBoston Red SoxAmerican LeagueSecond Baseman
Pre-GenerationalTexasThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaSt. Louis BrownsAmerican LeagueFirst Baseman

On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Pat Newnam. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .565) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .287). Pat Newnam had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.

Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Pat Newnam

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
123
147.6
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
500
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
446
535.2
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.624
0.624
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
95
114
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
78
93.6
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
7
8.4
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
8
9.6
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
2.4
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
17
20.4
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.179
0.179
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.005
0.005
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.021
0.021
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
0.47
140.43
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
42.94
51.52
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
124
148.8
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
141
169.2
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.287
0.287
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.565
0.565
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.065
0.065
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.35
0.35
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.541
0.541
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.258
0.258
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
56
67.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
31
37.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
85
102
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
0.54
160.83
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
46.09
55.31
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
5
6
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
41
49.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
83
99.6
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
6.02
6.02
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.49
0.49
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
8
9.6
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
20
24
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
20
24
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
100
100

Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Pat Newnam

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
2
2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
2
4.5
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
123
1.23
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
103
1.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
2697
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
899
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
1241
12.42
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
1
2.25
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
70
0.7
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
0.35
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
1346
13.47
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
1311
13.12
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
100
100
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.4
97.4
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
10.659
10.659
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
83.74
83.74
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pat Newnam
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
64
0.64
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0