Kim Andrew vs. Tim Naehring — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Tim Naehring. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .788) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .368). Tim Naehring had the advantage in home run production (49 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Tim Naehring
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
2162
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.799
0.799
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
285.79
79.31
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.365
0.365
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
298.75
82.91
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
6.93
6.93
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 600 PA
57
15.82
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Tim Naehring
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 9 Innings
522
1.09
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 9 Innings
12938
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 9 Innings
4312.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 9 Innings
1720
3.59
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 9 Innings
1667
3.48
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.92
96.92
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Tim Naehring
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.194
3.194