Kim Andrew vs. Jeff McNeil — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Jeff McNeil. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .781) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .353). Jeff McNeil had the advantage in home run production (80 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Jeff McNeil
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
3621
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.795
0.795
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
499.12
82.7
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.351
0.351
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.428
0.428
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
522.18
86.53
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
8.42
8.42
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 600 PA
42
6.96
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Jeff McNeil
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 9 Innings
992
1.24
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 9 Innings
21668
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 9 Innings
7222.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 9 Innings
2703
3.37
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 9 Innings
2656
3.31
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.26
98.26
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jeff McNeil
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.677
2.677