Kim Andrew vs. Ed McFarland — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McFarland. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .704) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .335). Ed McFarland had the advantage in home run production (13 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed McFarland
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3364
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.275
0.275
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.736
0.736
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
400.99
71.52
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
1098
195.84
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.335
0.335
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.369
0.369
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
442.02
78.84
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
19.33
19.33
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed McFarland
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
849
1.06
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
21588
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
4376
5.47
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
4225
5.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.55
96.55
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.976
4.976
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
851
1.06