Kim Andrew vs. Mark Loretta — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Mark Loretta. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .756) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .362). Mark Loretta had the advantage in home run production (76 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Mark Loretta
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
1726
157.91
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
6558
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
816.76
74.73
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.36
0.36
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.395
0.395
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
889.7
81.4
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
10.84
10.84
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 600 PA
157
14.36
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Mark Loretta
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 9 Innings
1685
1.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 9 Innings
37162
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 9 Innings
12387.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 9 Innings
7047
5.12
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 9 Innings
6955
5.05
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.69
98.69
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Mark Loretta
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.128
4.128