Kim Andrew vs. Walter Lonergan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Walter Lonergan. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .566) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .296). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Walter Lonergan
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
10
206.9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
29
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.631
0.631
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
2.21
45.76
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
8
165.52
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.296
0.296
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.201
0.201
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.474
0.474
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
2.81
58.14
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
4.14
4.14
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Walter Lonergan
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Walter Lonergan
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.31