Kim Andrew vs. Jim Lindeman — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Lindeman. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .682) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .292). Jim Lindeman had the advantage in home run production (21 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim Lindeman
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
736
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.697
0.697
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
78.13
63.69
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.289
0.289
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.391
0.391
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
77.87
63.48
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
4.25
4.25
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 600 PA
11
8.97
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim Lindeman
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
238
1.68
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
3817
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1272.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
653
4.62
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
643
4.55
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.47
98.47
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Lindeman
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.702
2.702