Kim Andrew vs. Matt LaPorta — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Matt LaPorta. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .696) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .303). Matt LaPorta had the advantage in home run production (31 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Matt LaPorta
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
1068
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.238
0.238
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.711
0.711
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
118.28
66.45
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.302
0.302
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.393
0.393
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
116.99
65.73
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
4.79
4.79
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 600 PA
21
11.8
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Matt LaPorta
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 9 Innings
257
1.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 9 Innings
6399
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 9 Innings
1964
8.29
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 9 Innings
1950
8.23
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.29
99.29
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Matt LaPorta
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.588
7.588