Kim Andrew vs. Rimp Lanier — Career Comparison

Baby BoomersCaliforniaThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaBoston Red SoxAmerican LeagueSecond Baseman
Baby BoomersAlabamaThrows RightBats LeftNorth AmericaPittsburgh PiratesNational LeagueUnknown

On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Rimp Lanier. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .200). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.

Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Rimp Lanier

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Rimp Lanier
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
6
720
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Rimp Lanier
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
5
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Rimp Lanier
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
4
480
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.47
140.43
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0.03
3.21
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.35
0.35
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
0.09
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.54
160.83
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.09
-11.33
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
120
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Rimp Lanier
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
5
5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Rimp Lanier
Career
Per 600 PA