Kim Andrew vs. Mark Johnson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Mark Johnson. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .634) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .316). Mark Johnson had the advantage in home run production (16 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Mark Johnson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1102
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.671
0.671
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
102.54
55.83
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.314
0.314
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.221
0.221
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
106.41
57.93
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
5.59
5.59
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
14
7.62
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Mark Johnson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
327
1.13
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
7781
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2593.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1982
6.88
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1968
6.83
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.29
99.29
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.018
6.018
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Mark Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
93
0.32