Kim Andrew vs. Dick Johnston — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Dick Johnston. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .651) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .285). Dick Johnston had the advantage in home run production (33 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Dick Johnston
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
746
142.78
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
3135
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.694
0.694
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
340.81
65.23
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.285
0.285
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.366
0.366
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.22
0.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
370.37
70.89
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 600 PA
11.08
11.08
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Dick Johnston
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
747
1.03
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
19533
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
6511
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
1624
2.24
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
1994
2.76
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
1799
2.49
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.22
90.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Dick Johnston
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.408
2.408