Kim Andrew vs. Jim Howarth — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Howarth. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .566) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .300). Jim Howarth had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim Howarth
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.217
0.217
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.595
0.595
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
18.58
43.9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
20.37
48.11
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
8.76
8.76
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 600 PA
4
9.45
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim Howarth
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
70
1.65
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
128
3.02
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
127
3
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.22
99.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Howarth
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.814
1.814