Kim Andrew vs. Frank Graves — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Frank Graves. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .360) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .193). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Frank Graves
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
145
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.152
0.152
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.441
0.441
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
6.19
25.62
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
0.129
0.129
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
4.24
17.55
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Frank Graves
Career
Per 600 PA
3.02
3.02
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Frank Graves
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
1.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
1128
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
345
8.26
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
304
7.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.12
88.12
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Frank Graves
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.756
6.756