Kim Andrew vs. Niko Goodrum — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Niko Goodrum. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .681) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .298). Niko Goodrum had the advantage in home run production (42 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Niko Goodrum
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
1564
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.224
0.224
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
172.81
66.3
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.297
0.297
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.383
0.383
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
163.3
62.65
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 600 PA
26
9.97
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Niko Goodrum
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 9 Innings
421
1.19
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 9 Innings
9580
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 9 Innings
3193.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 9 Innings
1557
4.39
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 9 Innings
1511
4.26
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.05
97.05
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Niko Goodrum
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.589
3.589