Kim Andrew vs. Ed Goebel — Career Comparison

Baby BoomersCaliforniaThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaBoston Red SoxAmerican LeagueSecond Baseman
Lost GenerationNew YorkThrows RightBats RightNorth AmericaWashington SenatorsAmerican LeagueUnknown

On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Goebel. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .697) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .358). Ed Goebel had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.

Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Goebel

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
37
331.34
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
67
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
2
600
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
59
528.36
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.717
0.717
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
16
143.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
14
125.37
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
8.96
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
8.96
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
17.91
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.125
0.125
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.017
0.017
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.063
0.063
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
0.47
140.43
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
7.63
68.33
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
20
179.1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
1
300
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
24
214.93
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.358
0.358
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.339
0.339
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.697
0.697
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.068
0.068
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.35
0.35
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
1
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.659
0.659
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
13
116.42
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
3
26.87
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
15
134.33
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PAverified
0.54
160.83
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PA
8.61
77.15
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
8
71.64
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
16
143.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
4.19
4.19
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
0.5
0.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
8.96
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
1
8.96
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
2
17.91
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 600 PAverified
50
50

Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Goebel

Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
1
1
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
2
4.5
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
16
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
12
27
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Careerverified
Per 9 Inningsverified
4
9
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
1
2.25
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
29
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
1
2.25
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
2
4.5
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
30
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
2
4.5
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
30
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
100
100
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Inningsverified
1
1
Ed Goebel
Careerverified
Per 9 Innings
1.875
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed Goebel
Career
Per 9 Innings
0