Kim Andrew vs. Jim Gleeson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Gleeson. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .741) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .350). Jim Gleeson had the advantage in home run production (16 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim Gleeson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
1471
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.767
0.767
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
186.16
75.93
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.391
0.391
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
194.14
79.19
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
10.01
10.01
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 600 PA
21
8.57
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Jim Gleeson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 9 Innings
336
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 9 Innings
697
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Gleeson
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.21