Kim Andrew vs. Ed Giovanola — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Giovanola. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .587) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .318). Ed Giovanola had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Giovanola
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
356
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
0.216
0.216
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
0.633
0.633
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
26.88
45.31
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
0.21
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
30.34
51.13
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
7.27
7.27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 600 PA
9
15.17
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Giovanola
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 9 Innings
183
2.27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 9 Innings
2176
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 9 Innings
725.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 9 Innings
369
4.58
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 9 Innings
363
4.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.37
98.37
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ed Giovanola
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.984
1.984