Kim Andrew vs. Cito Gaston — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Cito Gaston. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .698) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .301). Cito Gaston had the advantage in home run production (91 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Cito Gaston
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
3339
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.706
0.706
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
361.17
64.9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.397
0.397
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
372.06
66.86
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
4.82
4.82
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 600 PA
85
15.27
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Cito Gaston
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 9 Innings
785
1.08
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 9 Innings
19589
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 9 Innings
6529.2
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 9 Innings
1676
2.31
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 9 Innings
1625
2.24
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.96
96.96
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Cito Gaston
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.07
2.07