Kim Andrew vs. Ed Gastfield — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Gastfield. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .168) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .089). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Gastfield
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.068
0.068
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.63
4.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.089
0.089
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.06
0.06
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 600 PA
2.43
2.43
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Ed Gastfield
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
0.93
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
249
9.22
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
211
7.81
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
84.74
84.74
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ed Gastfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.44
8.44