Kim Andrew vs. Daniel Fields — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Kim Andrew and Daniel Fields are closely matched on the surface stats. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in on-base percentage (.500 vs .333) and batting average (.500 vs .333). Daniel Fields had the advantage in slugging (.667 vs .500). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Daniel Fields
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
109.5
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Daniel Fields
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.86
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67