Kim Andrew vs. Hank Erickson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Hank Erickson. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .698) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .323). Hank Erickson had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Hank Erickson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
97
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.711
0.711
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
10.84
67.07
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.323
0.323
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.239
0.239
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
11.96
74
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
24.25
24.25
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
6.19
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Hank Erickson
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
103
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Hank Erickson
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.17