Kim Andrew vs. Charlie Eden — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Charlie Eden. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .669) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .296). Charlie Eden had the advantage in home run production (4 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Charlie Eden
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
982
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.675
0.675
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
103.53
63.26
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.296
0.296
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.372
0.372
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
113.85
69.56
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 600 PA
37.77
37.77
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Charlie Eden
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 9 Innings
234
1.06
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 9 Innings
5973
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 9 Innings
409
1.85
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 9 Innings
322
1.46
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 9 Innings
78.73
78.73
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Charlie Eden
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.376
1.376