Kim Andrew vs. Steve Cox — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Steve Cox. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .760) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .343). Steve Cox had the advantage in home run production (39 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Steve Cox
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Steve Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Steve Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.772
0.772
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Steve Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
176.84
75.84
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Steve Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Steve Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Steve Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
178.66
76.62
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Steve Cox
Career
Per 600 PA
37
15.87
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Steve Cox
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Steve Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
282
1.11
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Steve Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
1883
7.39
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Steve Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
1867
7.33
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Steve Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.15
99.15
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Steve Cox
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.621
6.621