Kim Andrew vs. Henry Cotto — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Henry Cotto. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .672) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .302). Henry Cotto had the advantage in home run production (44 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Henry Cotto
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
2333
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.717
0.717
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
252.05
64.82
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.299
0.299
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
260.42
66.97
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
6.63
6.63
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 600 PA
49
12.6
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Henry Cotto
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
760
1.45
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
14146
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
4715.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
1371
2.62
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
1356
2.59
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.91
98.91
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Henry Cotto
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.784
1.784