Kim Andrew vs. Pete Cassidy — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Pete Cassidy. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .632) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .307). Pete Cassidy had the advantage in home run production (3 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Pete Cassidy
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
413
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
41.69
60.57
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.307
0.307
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.325
0.325
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
46.54
67.61
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 600 PA
20.65
20.65
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Pete Cassidy
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.09
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 9 Innings
2469
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 9 Innings
866
9.47
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 9 Innings
821
8.98
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.8
94.8
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pete Cassidy
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.21
8.21