Kim Andrew vs. Earl Averill — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Kim Andrew and Earl Averill are closely matched on the surface stats. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .928) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .395). Earl Averill had the advantage in slugging (.534 vs .500). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Andrew and Earl Averill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
1668
138.71
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
7215
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.925
0.925
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
1327.45
110.39
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
2826
235.01
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.395
0.395
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.534
0.534
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.311
0.311
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
1371.6
114.06
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
13.93
13.93
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Earl Averill
Career
Per 600 PA
7
0.58
Fielding Stats for Kim Andrew and Earl Averill
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Earl Averill
Career
Per 9 Innings
1589
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Earl Averill
Career
Per 9 Innings
4084
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Earl Averill
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.01