Jim Andrews vs. Ted Reed — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ted Reed posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Andrews. Ted Reed posted stronger numbers in OPS (.612 vs .550) and on-base percentage (.288 vs .278). Jim Andrews had the advantage in home run production (3 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Ted Reed had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Ted Reed
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.666
0.666
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.325
0.325
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.084
0.084
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.065
0.065
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.509
0.509
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
8.95
60.37
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
12.71
12.71
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
11
29.07
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
1
6.74
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Ted Reed
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Ted Reed
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Ted Reed
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Ted Reed
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Ted Reed
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.45