Jim Andrews vs. Al Nevin — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Andrews and Al Nevin are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .505) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .214). Al Nevin had the advantage in slugging (.291 vs .272). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Al Nevin
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.509
0.509
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.291
0.291
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.084
0.084
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.169
0.169
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.378
0.378
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
3.22
34.49
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Al Nevin
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.24
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
59
5.21
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
3
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.63
57.63
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.429
2.429