Jim Andrews vs. Francis Nance — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Francis Nance. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .100) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .100). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Francis Nance
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
53
140.09
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
4
218.18
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
11
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.72
52.13
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.01
0.66
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
63
166.52
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
1
54.55
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.045
0.045
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Francis Nance
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.16
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1425
27
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
93
27
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
475
9
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
9
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
0.19
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
4.35
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
7.26
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
6.97
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
6