Jim Andrews vs. Ed McDonough — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McDonough. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .100). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Ed McDonough
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.72
52.13
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
5.34
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.07
0.07
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Ed McDonough
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.14
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1425
27
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
63
27
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
475
9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
9
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.8
2.8
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86