Jim Andrews vs. Earl Jones — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earl Jones posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Andrews. Earl Jones posted stronger numbers in OPS (.856 vs .550) and on-base percentage (.300 vs .278). Jim Andrews had the advantage in home run production (3 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Earl Jones had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Earl Jones
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
0.85
0.85
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.084
0.084
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
0.274
0.274
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
0.857
0.857
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Earl Jones
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Earl Jones
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Earl Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.35
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Earl Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
3.15
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Earl Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
3.15
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Earl Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Earl Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.333
2.333
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.02
Earl Jones
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.45